Synopsis: While Syrian people look to be more and more mired in an endless conflict, and the world subject to an unprecedented wave of terrorist acts, it seems now more and more legitimate to raise a number of questions. Intended to compete "Al Qaeda" and thus to root a fratricidal duality within the Arab world, how does the Islamic state end up contributing to the preservation of US supremacy ? Leading China to its first foreign military involvement and entering Russia to an infinite quagmire, how does ISIS serve that much the American interests ? How does Washington justify its inaction advocating even for speech freedom whereas the whole world call to muzzle social networks ? How does he manage to retake leadership over its tech moguls ? These are so many interrogations that deserve reflection. Although the doubts raised by the competitive agenda of the stakeholders, the media announce today the close end of the Islamic state. Anyway, the terrorist group has never been so strong ideologically relying on a Sunni ethny prey alas to an endemic poverty, a very uncertain future and, above all, a very heavy Shiite contempt.