Excerpt from Strictures on Dr. Marsh's Comparative View of the Churches of England and Rome 'what impression the' perusal of this passage may have made'on thereader's mind, Lwilhnot pretend to divine. For myself, I will own, that l was'disappointed. From the solemnity. Of the introduction I had been'le'd to expectsome very cogent argument, some express declarae tion from the word of God, that the. Scripture, to theexclusion of: tradition, was the only rule of Christianity. Such at least would. Have been the manner in which a writer, adopting theriucip'les of the Comparative View}? And confident in* their accuracy, would naturally have proceededi If Dr. Marsh has not done so; because-he 'was conscious that he could not, that consciousness alone might have taught him -to' doubt the truth of his own doctrine. What then has he donep'. Why, nothing to'the purpose. Instead of proving his own asser trifled away his time in an impotent attempt to 'shew, that a passage, which>he has selected from Bossuet, is alpetitio principii. Now, were this to be allowed him, still we should not be'adv'anced one step in the controversy. A logical error in an'.advocate. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.