Excerpt from General Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement, Haleakala National Park, Hawai'i: January 1995 Environmental consequences under the no action alternative would be less beneficial than under the proposal. With no new facilities and only minimal upgrading of existing ones possible, there would be little opportunity -to improve visitor services in the national park. This would be a long-term adverse effect. Under both the no action alternative and the minimum requirements alternative, there would be no opportunities for the National Park Service to manage lands in the Kaupo Ranch area/ for resource protection. The native vegetation, endangered wildlife, archeological sites and features, and wetland areas found here would not receive any additional levels of protection. Moreover, there would be no long-term guarantee of public access to this area. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.