A play, but how, one asks, is the audience to understand it correctly? Theory, Marxian, Freudian, Foucaultian, Derridean, Bourdieusque, won't help with it. They are by far not radically original enough: their founders were famous in their respective lifetimes, which means that they were considered safe enough to be mentioned. Nothing original at all. Among the panoply of this play's speaking and un-speaking characters the wisest is Candis, Candy. The play is followed by a twisted, bizarre essay.