This game truly lets you write history in all the right ways.

Paying respect to the true lives lost in World War Two, it ignites a flame inside you that drives you on to defeat the enemy. Great Graphics, with reasonable demand GFX wise, Geforce Ti's play it no probs, this is a fun game to sit back and play online and single-player.

3 Campaigns as an American, Britishman, and a Russian you immerse yourself into three totally different concepts of 19th – 20th century warfare.

Great Play, good investment with a DSL connection

If Medal of Honour: Allied Assault (MOHAA) is considered to be the game version of ‘Saving Private Ryan’, then Call of Duty (CoD) can be considered the game version of ‘Band of Brothers’.

Developed by the team behind MOHAA, CoD was guaranteed to be a quality piece – and it is. CoD is strikingly similar to MOHAA in many ways, yet is updated enough to be considered a pseudo-sequel.

While CoD is still based on the Quake 3 engine, it has been transformed and improved significantly from its deathmatch origins and renders the open and closed areas convincingly well, allowing for, at times, some very nice visuals. Character models have also been improved, allowing for realistic movement and facial animations.

The games audio also deserves special mention… it is brilliant! I use a 5.1 speaker setup and the sound was so crisp and well produced it was startling. A perfect example of how important good audio can be to a game.

The game is heavily scripted, but it is the price you pay for some of the ‘Wow!’ moments you're in store for. Some might find the game too ‘on rails’, and while it may feel that way, the developers have done their best to make this transparent, allowing you a certain degree of freedom.

While some of the missions (especially those indoors) are a bit drab and ho-hum, most of the game's scenes are well crafted, capturing the action of war so completely, it is stunning. A few of these scenes are extremely memorable and jaw-droppingly good.

Multiplayer seems to be a love/hate preference. From the little I played of it, it did nothing for me. I say, buy this for the single player and try Battlefield 1942 for multiplayer.

Probably the best WW2 FPS experience to date.

As a fan of MoH:AA I purchased CoD hearing the original team behind MoH created it. Its actually pretty obvious when you start playing the game. The same feeling of being in heated fire-fights from the MoH franchise is present in this game, and the graphics style (very dated now) is almost identical.

The not-so-steller graphics do not detract from the gameplay however, as what it lacks in graphics it more than makes up for in atmosphere, espeacially evident in the early Russian missions with you charging, unarmed, at German machine-gun nests outside Stalingrad.

Where this game really fails is in the A.I. The game's selling point is its team based A.I, but in the highest difficulty setting the A.I breaks down almost completely. Though the enemy bots can do some pretty silly things (i.e. throwing a grenade at you when you're standing next to them), it's nothing compared to your suicidal, murderous allies.

These guys do more to get you killed than to aid you in your attacks. They'll stand in the open, near enemy machine-gun nests; they'll bloke you in doorways; and even throw grenades at you if you're in close proximety to an enemy. They'll let enemy units they're standing next to shoot at you without responding, only reacting when they themselves are shot at. And what do they do? They duck, right out in the open. It came to the point on some occasions where I'd simply let the enemy wipe out my crew and then do the missions solo.

If they A.I was up to scratch I may well of marked this game 5 stars. But with the failing of the A.I I can barely rate it a 4.